The bicycle’s path into the Federal Constitution

Footpaths and hiking trails have long held constitutional status. If approved by the Swiss people on 23 September 2018, cycle paths will receive the same honour.

In good shape: More importance is to be attached to cycling and it will receive constitutional status. Photo: Keystone

“Incredible” was how Ursula Wyss described the increase in cycling in the federal capital in April 2018. The city councillor responsible for transport was clearly very surprised herself at the cycling boom. Cycling had risen by 35 % in the short period from 2014 to 2017. The city is now looking to step it up a gear by increasing the proportion that cyclists make up of total traffic from 15 % at the moment to 20 % by 2030.

The city of Berne is not a unique case. Cycling is on the up nationwide (also see Swiss Review no. 3/2018). The bicycle is now also set to find its way into the Federal Constitution – provided Swiss voters approve a federal decree on cycle paths at the ballot box on 23 September 2018. This proposal involves supplementing Article 88 on footpaths and hiking trails, which has been part of the Constitution for 40 years. It has resulted in the creation of a unique network of footpaths and hiking trails. An extensive network of cycle paths is now also to be established in Switzerland.

Cross-party praise

The idea comes from the bike initiative by Pro Velo, an umbrella organisation representing the interests of cyclists. The Federal Council also supported the basic thrust of the proposal. It put forward a slightly watered-down counterproposal: federal government will bear the same responsibilities as for the footpaths and hiking trails, thus restricting itself to basic framework legislation. The planning, construction and maintenance of the cycle paths will be the responsibility of the cantons and communes. Federal government cannot take on any new duties due to tight financial and staff restrictions, according to national government. The counterproposal therefore does not provide for any funding obligation. Federal government can nevertheless lay down principles for cycle path networks. It can also support and coordinate cantonal measures for the construction and maintenance of such networks.

Cycling as a mode of transport received overwhelming support from all parties in Parliament. No criticism at all was voiced in the Council of States. Only the SVP rejected the Federal Council’s counterproposal in the National Council. Parliamentary group spokesperson Thomas Hurter said that no additional measures were required as “Switzerland is already a cycling nation”. This idea was refuted by Bastien Girod, the Greens National Councillor, who contended that the lack of infrastructure prevented Switzerland from becoming a cycling nation as “yellow lines are not enough”. SP National Councillor Evi Allemann said that Switzerland needs to catch up with other countries abroad. Various speakers underlined the benefits of cycling. It could help to alleviate peak traffic and reduce energy consumption, and it has health benefits.

Objective achieved, initiative withdrawn

After parliament’s approval of the counterproposal, the authors of the bike initiative returned the favour by withdrawing their popular initiative. They declared that their goal had been achieved. “The federal decree on bicycles addresses the core issues of the initiative, namely giving cycle paths equivalent status to footpaths and hiking trails,” stated SP National Councillor Matthias Aebischer, president of the association behind the bike initiative. The committee behind the proposal is now backed by numerous organisations from the fields of tourism, health, sport, transport, business and the environment. Even the car-friendly Touring Club Suisse (TCS) supports the initiative. TCS Vice-President and FDP National Councillor Thierry Burkart remarked: “The separation of traffic flows is in the interests of all road users, including motorists. It helps to create capacity.”

Comments (2)
  • Thomas Schneider
    Thomas Schneider at 13.09.2018
    Immer heisst es, Velowege sollen in die Bundesverfassung, weil auch Fuss- und Wanderwege drin stehen. Aber in der Schweiz gibt es keinen Anspruch auf Gleichbehandlung im Unrecht. Fuss- und Wanderwege sind nicht verfassungswürdig und sollten damit nicht in der Bundesverfassung stehen, und damit Velowege auch nicht.

    Dass Fuss- und Wanderwege nicht verfassungswürdig sind, stammt übrigens nicht von mir, sondern vom Bundesamt für Justiz. Deshalb wurden sie bei der Totalrevision der Bundesverfassung (1999 in Kraft getreten) aus der Verfassung gestrichen. Das kann in diesem Dokument des BJ nachgelesen werden: <a href="https://www.bj.admin.ch/dam/data/bj/staat/gesetzgebung/archiv/bundesverfassung/bv-errung-d.pdf">https://www.bj.admin.ch/dam/data/bj/staat/gesetzgebung/archiv/bundesverfassung/bv-errung-d.pdf</a> (Seite 11 bzw. 12).
    Show Translation
  • Ataman
    Ataman at 30.09.2018
    Ils sont dangereux. Ils ne respectent aucun code. Beaucoup n'ont ni frein, ni sonnette, ni lumière, ni immatriculation. Et quel plaisir de rouler dans les vapeurs dégagées par les vehicules, sous la pluie et par le froid.
    Show Translation

Write new comment

The editorial team reserves the right to delete discriminatory, racist, defamatory or inflammatory comments or to block the comment function for this article.

Whenever a new suspension bridge or summit viewing platform is planned in the Alps, objections are soon raised about commercialising the mountains and...

Read more

Switzerland is at the very forefront of international research on outer space. It is now demonstrating its penchant for tidiness by becoming a debris...

Read more
Economy
07/31/2018

Yellow gloss tarnished

PostBus was an exemplary company. Then a subsidy scandal erupted which was unprecedented in Switzerland. The matter has still not been fully resolved....

Read more

The world of football is dominated by money. Yet in Switzerland there is a colourful alternative league which even recognised the right to strike in...

Read more
 

Auslandschweizer Organisation
Alpenstrasse 26
3006 Bern, Schweiz

tel +41 31 356 61 10
fax +41 31 356 61 01
revue@aso.ch