Switzerland helps to return migrants to Libya

The Swiss Confederation has allocated a million Swiss francs to the Libyan coastguard. This policy has helped to curb crossings but various NGOs have denounced it as being tantamount to supporting migrant trafficking.

Libyan refugees aboard a boat are rescued on the open sea. Photo: Keystone

A million Swiss francs for the Libyan coastguard – that is the amount which Switzerland committed in 2017 as part of a European programme run by the International Organization for Migration (IOM). “Three training schemes have been provided for the authorities responsible for sea rescue and migration,” states Emmanuelle Jaquet von Sury, a spokesperson for the Federal Department of Justice and Police (FDJP). “Particular emphasis has been placed on registering migrants after rescue operations at sea to ensure their cases are followed up, including in the detention facilities.”

The coastguard have received 2,500 items of rescue equipment, including life jackets, first aid kits and blankets, according to the FDJP. Switzerland is not there on the ground to monitor the implementation of this programme, “but the presence of representatives of the IOM and the High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in most ports to the west of Tripoli ensures assistance and a certain degree of protection is provided during disembarkation and, in particular, the registration and detection of particularly vulnerable cases”, says the spokesperson. However she adds, “the conflict situation in Libya sometimes reduces the mobility of IOM personnel and complicates the implementation of the project.”

Accusations of racketeering and murderous interventions at sea

Various NGOs have accused the Libyan coastguard of involvement in migrant trafficking. They claim the crews of the Libyan Coast Guards (LCG) have even caused people to drown. This is revealed in a report published at the end of 2017 by Amnesty International, which refers to an incident that occurred on 6 November, during which the manoeuvres of a coastguard frigate played a part in the drowning of around 50 people.

The FDJP said that it did not have any official information to confirm the incident. “However, the alarming number of ships that have sunk in the Mediterranean Sea – with 2,832 deaths in 2017 – obliges us to help ensure better protection for migrants. The IOM project for sea rescue was set up to pursue this humanitarian objective,” says Emmanuelle Jaquet von Sury. Amnesty points to double standards. “The European states, which are well aware of the serious violations suffered by refugees and migrants in Libya, have chosen to control migration by supporting the Libyan authorities. By stopping the crossings, they are keeping thousands of people in a country where they are systematically subjected to abuse and where they have little or no chance of finding protection,” it states.

“The people saved at sea tell us that they would prefer to die than return to detention centres in Libya,” says Caroline Abu Sa’Da, director of SOS Méditérannée Suisse, an association involved in the rescue operations carried out by the vessel Aquarius. She believes it is impossible to trust the LCG. “Who are these coastguards actually? They are just militia carrying out interception operations and taking migrants back to detention facilities where the conditions are atrocious, sometimes preventing aid from NGOs reaching them. Switzerland cannot turn a blind eye by simply being satisfied that these units are taking people out of the water.”

As the organiser of the third meeting of the Central Mediterranean Contact Group in November 2017 in Berne, “Switzerland is aligning itself with a repressive European policy which aims to prevent access for migrants to Europe,” comments Vincent Chetail, Director of the Global Migration Centre of the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva. The European Union (EU) provided 46 million euros in 2017 to strengthen the intervention capacities of the Libyan authorities. It highlights the fact that this policy led to a significant reduction in the number of crossings last year. The FDJP indicates that this strategy has enabled the rescue of 14,000 people at sea. “Libya, which has not ratified the Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, is not a country of asylum. It is not safe nor does it offer protection. There is no system in place and the funds allocated will be misused,” counters the professor of international law, who believes that “Europe is making itself complicit to abuse.”

Forced to undertake even more hazardous crossings

The expert condemns an ineffective policy that increases the dangers. “The crossings from Libya or Tunisia are the easiest routes. If they are blocked off, the flow of migrants will shift elsewhere, increasing the risk of crossings that endanger human life.” The founder of the Global Migration Centre believes the overall perception of migration is distorted. “In 2015, the number of asylum seekers arriving in Europe stood at 1.2 million, which is 0.2 % of the EU population, and that was a statistical peak. It cannot therefore be called a mass influx. The real challenges are helping the reconstruction of Libya and reviewing migration policy, in particular by opening up legal access routes to Europe,” says Chetail. According to Amnesty International, almost half a million people set sail between 2015 and 2017, resulting in 10,000 deaths. The number of exiles in Libya exceeds 400,000 people according to the IOM, and an estimated 20,000 migrants are being held in detention centres.

In addition to the UNHCR and the IOM, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), which visits detention facilities in Libya, also attended the third contact group meeting in Berne in November 2017 and pointed out that “a migration policy must also aim to reduce the use of detention centres as a means of managing migration, as well as reduce the abuse of migrants.” The organisation recommended “improving the management of human remains and data about deceased persons to facilitate the provision of information about their death and where it occurred for the families of the deceased”, according to spokesperson Thomas Glass.

In the Mediterranean, winter has not stopped the crossings. On Tuesday 16 January, the crew of the Aquarius carried out five consecutive rescue operations, saving 505 lives. On the same day, the Italian coastguard, which has coordinated a total of 11 rescue operations – by NGOs and merchant vessels – estimated that 1,400 people had been saved off the coast of Libya. “It’s impossible to cover the entire rescue zone with three NGO boats which are permanently stationed there,” SOS Méditerranée said, calling upon European states to commit to establishing a European rescue fleet to prevent thousands of deaths.

Comments (5)
  • Bonvin Marielle
    Bonvin Marielle at 23.03.2018
    Envoyer de l'argent pour les garde-côtes lybiens n'est pas le meilleur moyen d'aider les migrants. On ne peut pas faire confiance aux Lybiens. Oui, ces prisons, c'est pire que la mort, et c'est ce que veulent les autorités suisses pour avoir bonne conscience? C'est honteur! Ce million de francs serait plus utile à aider les pays d'où viennent les migrants pour qu'ils développent chez eux des formations pour les gens, leur apprennent à travailler leur terre et développent des industries modestes. Pour cela, la Suisse devrait s'allier à des Ong européennes qui ont compris le problème et n'ont pas peur de se mouiller.
    Show Translation
  • HR Benzi
    HR Benzi at 23.03.2018
    "Alors que l’Union européenne finance, à hauteur de dizaines de millions d’euros, les garde-côtes libyens, il est établi que certains de leurs membres sont compromis dans le trafic de migrants. Rome, de son côté, est accusé de négocier directement avec les milices de Sabratha pour empêcher le départ des embarcations." Ce titre de Mediapart peut aussi s'appliquer à la Suisse qui soutient aussi cette prétendue "surveillance".
    Show Translation
  • Erwin Balli-Bautista
    Erwin Balli-Bautista at 23.03.2018
    So lange in den afrikanischen Staaten keine oder nur eine geringe wirtschaftliche, soziale und hygienische Infrastruktur besteht, fehlt doch jegliche Zukunftsperspektive. Und die Leute fliehen doch dorthin, wo sie sich ein besseres Leben erhoffen. Alles andere sind doch veilchenblaue Tagträume, hat man doch diesen Kontinent über Jahrhunderte auf Teufel komm raus ausgebeutet, eine richtiggehende Entwicklung vermieden etc. Das heisst im Klartext Geld, sehr viel Geld, in die Hand nehmen und mithelfen, die angesprochene Infrastruktur aufzubauen. Und das, so rasch wie irgendwie möglich, denn die Bevölkerung Afrikas wird sich in den kommenden 40 Jahren verdoppeln. Mir fehlt die Phantasie, um mir vorzustellen, Was dann auf merry old Europa zukommen wird.
    Show Translation
    • Juerg DeMarmels
      Juerg DeMarmels at 19.04.2018
      Also, die afrikanischen Staaten sind seit den 60er Jahren unabhaengig, und viele von ihnen haben sehr, sehr viel Geld eingenommen mit dem Verkauf ihrer Bodenschaetze, plus Millionen von Entwicklungshilfe. Wo ist das Geld? Sind wir Europaeer schuld an der grassierenden Korruption dort und der Unfaehigkeit ihre Laender aufzubauen? Oder an den islamistischen Buergerkriegen und Metzeleien? Was heisst hier "Ausbeutung"? Was wuerden denn Staaten wie Nigeria, Angola etc. machen, wenn die Industriestaaten kein Erdoel brauchten? Sie koennten gar nichts damit anfangen; sie haben ja in den 60 Jahren seut der Unabhaengigkeit kaum Industrie oder sonstwas aufgebaut. Dasselbe gilt fuer die uebrigen Bodenschaetze. Keine Nachfrage, kein Einkommen, grosse Nachfrage, grosses Einkommen. Wenn Europa nun hunderttausende Afrikaner aufnimmt, helfen wir nicht Afrika, sondern verwandeln unsere eigenen Laender in shithole Staaten. Man sieht bereits die Vorboten.
      Show Translation
  • Hansjörg
    Hansjörg at 24.03.2018
    Wow. I do love that in your articles your writers display BOTH sides of a topic! Never is only the "roses and wine" version the only version shown! Excellent. And thank you!
    Show Translation

Write new comment

Comments are approved within one to three days. The editorial team reserves the right not to publish discriminatory, racist, defamatory or inflammatory comments. Our detailed comment rules are available here.

The bottle cap comes off with a “pop”, the beer flows into the glass, bubbles rise and a frothy head forms. There is nowhere with such a wide range of...

Read more

The Swiss National Bank isn’t the only institution that issues money. Commercial banks are also involved in its creation. A popular initiative that...

Read more

Switzerland has for the second time promised 1.3 billion Swiss francs to the EU for the development of poorer Member States. However, attempts by...

Read more

Fifty years ago, it seemed in Switzerland too that the time had come to radically change the world. Fritz Osterwalder was involved in the 1968...

Read more

Auslandschweizer Organisation
Alpenstrasse 26
3006 Bern, Schweiz

tel +41 31 356 61 10
fax +41 31 356 61 01