Opposed to the “marriage penalty”

“It is unfair that married couples and registered partnerships are disadvantaged compared to cohabiting couples in terms of taxes and social insurance. With equal income and assets, they pay more tax and receive lower old-age and survivors’ insurance pensions,” according to the CVP’s homepage. The party has therefore submitted a popular initiative entitled “Supporting marriage and families – against the marriage penalty”. It will face a vote at referendum on 28 February.

The initiative also states that marriage is a “legally governed relationship of cohabitation between husband and wife”. This definition would be entered in the constitution for the first time and would exclude other forms of cohabitation from marriage.

In the view of the initiative’s opponents, it is difficult to determine whether married or cohabiting couples are disadvantaged or advantaged overall, taking account of the federal government and cantonal levels, the different stages in life and the whole tax and social insurance system. The Federal Supreme Court actually concluded at the end of 2013 that cohabiting couples were financially disadvantaged overall compared to married couples despite the applicable old-age and survivors’ insurance regulations.

(JM)

Comments (3)
  1. Maria Cristina Vanini Maria Cristina Vanini at 21.02.2016
    Soy Maria Cristina Vanini, vivo en Argentina, pero pienso que qualquiera estara confundido con este articulo.Por favor aclarennos este tema,gracias
  2. Maria Cristina Vanini Maria Cristina Vanini at 21.02.2016
    Soy Maria Cristina Vanini, vivo en Argentina, pero pienso que qualquiera estara confundido con este articulo.Por favor aclarennos este tema,gracias
  3. Maria Cristina Vanini Maria Cristina Vanini at 21.02.2016
    Soy Maria Cristina Vanini, vivo en Argentina, pero pienso que qualquiera estara confundido con este articulo.Por favor aclarennos este tema,gracias

Write new comment

The editorial team reserves the right to delete discriminatory, racist, defamatory or inflammatory comments or to block the comment function for this article.

Over 35,000 people sought asylum in Switzerland last year. The continuing flow of refugees is inevitably producing both sympathy and hostility and a...

Read more

The Swiss Confederation’s spending on asylum in 2015 passed 1.27 billion Swiss francs, with the cantons paying 600 million. Over the long term,...

Read more

The Swiss People’s Party has effortlessly gained a sought-after second Federal Council seat for Guy Parmelin. Is this sign of stability also a sign of...

Read more

Johann Schneider-Ammann’s transformation from business leader to politician is still not complete after five years on the Federal Council. Perhaps...

Read more

The world’s longest railway tunnel will go into operation by the middle of the year. Just a few months before that, on 28 February, the Swiss people...

Read more
 

Auslandschweizer Organisation
Alpenstrasse 26
3006 Bern, Schweiz

tel +41 31 356 61 10
fax +41 31 356 61 01
revue@aso.ch