Concordance – a synopsis with question marks

Georg Kohler, professor emeritus of political philosophy at the University of Zurich, is conducting observation and analysis of the election campaign in Switzerland throughout 2015 on behalf of the Swiss Abroad.

First of all, three observations on the Swiss federal parliamentary elections in autumn 2015. Since the introduction of proportional representation in 1919, never has a party won such a large share of the vote as the Swiss People’s Party (SVP), which secured almost 30 %. That is a fact worthy of being described as historic.

Secondly, despite everything, in the main things remained within Swiss norms, even at these elections. Maximum gains and losses of just under 3 % are nothing out of the ordinary even in Switzerland’s stable political landscape. It was a different story in terms of the gain of seats. Eleven additional seats for the SVP, a 20 % increase – that is undoubtedly remarkable (for a major party). This outcome is explained not least by favourable circumstances with the distribution of the remaining seats, known as “proportional luck”. A familiar picture nevertheless emerged with regard to turnout. Just under half of those eligible cast a vote.

Thirdly – and most importantly – these elections have not proven decisive for the major issues facing the nation, indeed quite the opposite. What will happen regarding relations with the EU, international law and the supranational institutions that implement human rights law remains open as either-or decisions require a further turn of the screw. Why is that? Quite simply because the positions held by the second-largest party in the alliance of the “conservative” National Council majority, the Free Democrat-Liberal Party (FDP), on the issues mentioned contrast starkly with those of its partner to the right. They tend to be more laissez-faire and rather complex.

What does that mean for the next four years? The short-term forecast is straightforward. The SVP will in all likelihood obtain its desperately sought-after second Federal Council seat, and Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf, despite performing well, will not be part of Switzerland’s next government. The decisive factor here is not the position of the FDP but the fact that the severely reduced “centre” (CVP and GLP, above all) is not united in support of Widmer-Schlumpf’s third term in office – the condition which would have to be met to seal victory for the Federal Councillor from Grisons is therefore null and void.

A medium-term prognosis is not too difficult either. It can be defined simply by the voting ratio on Switzerland’s most powerful executive body. On all the issues that concern the nation’s relationship with international or transnational legal obligations and treaty communities, such as the extremely importunate problem of certainty over the previously predictable viability of the bilateral approach between Switzerland and the EU, voting in the Federal Council might no longer be 1:6, but instead 2:5 or even 3:4. However, the majority (regardless of the SVP’s electoral success in 2015) will continue to lie with the “centre-left” – to once again use this actually unsuitable categorisation.

What is the upshot of this analysis? As the FDP has clear commitments, it needs no further discussion. Consideration should instead be given to whether the SVP finds itself in a cul-de-sac that is uncomfortable for both itself and our nation. With its policy of high-risk and ruthless renationalisation of state sovereign powers and all its strategic issues in terms of foreign policy, it can unquestionably count on a third of the electorate. That constitutes a veto power which has continually been deployed during this decade – in directly democratic referenda – as part of Switzerland’s isolationist model and which the party promotes and defends with increasing tenacity.

To pursue such an approach is nonetheless only possible at the expense of any substantive concordance which in its time, when the magic formula was created in 1959, was a self-evident requirement. In short, arithmetical concordance, which the SVP will successfully call for at the Federal Council elections in December, is essentially nothing short of the denial of the form of concordance that characterised Switzerland during the post-war period and saw it flourish. But, given that the recipe for success put forward by the SVP, Switzerland’s most strongly supported party by far, as previously mentioned, is the exact opposite of this, we must brace ourselves, whether we like it or not, for difficult times and major turmoil.

Comments (5)
  1. Fredi Kriftner Fredi Kriftner at 09.11.2015
    Was Herr Kohler in seiner Prognose völlig vergessen hat, ist die künftige europolitische Entwicklung und deren Wirkung auf die CH- Politik. Die könnte durchaus massive Abweichungen von seinen Vorstellungen erwirken. So gesehen eben auch nur eine "isolationistische" Meinung. Nichts mehr.
  2. Rita Rita at 11.11.2015
    Falsch, Herr Prof. Kohler, 1959 ist die arithmetische, nicht die inhaltliche Konkordanz eingeführt worden. Bis in die 90er Jahre hinein wurden oft von der SP (BR-Partei mit 2 Sitzen) Initiativen und Referenden ergriffen, welche die bundesrätliche Politik direkt angriffen. Die SP konnte sich 1989 nicht einmal hinter die bewaffnete Neutralität stellen, das ist staatspolitisch um Dimensionen schwerwiegender, als die Infragestellung der Bilateralen durch die SVP heute. Jetzt setzt eben eher die SVP die direktdemokratischen Instrumente ein.
    Es ist deshalb unseriös, dies als unerhörten Affront abzuqualifizieren. Von einem Polit-Professor darf man seriösere Artikel erwarten, auch wenn Sie mit Links sympathisieren.
  3. Marc Dancer Marc Dancer at 16.11.2015
    Ich weis nicht auf welcher Seite Herr Kohler steht, vielleicht auf keiner - aber er nimmt alte Geschichte als Parameter für eine nicht vergleichbare neue Konstellationen in Politik u. Wirtschaft! Es geht hier nicht mehr um die Bilateralen sondern darum ob die CH durch einige verräterische Neo-Liberale- und neu-sozialistische Experimentalisten, die sich als unheilige Allianz zusammengefunden haben, in eine EU-Diktatur (s. Griechenland) gepresst werden kann od. nicht! Tragischerweise erkennen nur wenige, was das Ziel dieser Entwicklung ist: Europa soll verarmen, destabilisiert werden und damit den USA als "Troublemaker" gegen Russland dienen! Die Islaminvasion dient ebenfalls diesem Zweck! Russland soll gezwungen werden zu handeln um damit wieder als Aggressor zu gelten. Das würde den USA die Möglichkeit geben ein völlig destabilisiertes Europa zumindest teilweise zu annektieren. Europa soll für lange Zeit als Kriegszone missbraucht werden! Vergessen geht dabei, wer auf die Weltkarte sieht, dass die EU u. die CH eigentlich mit dem Osten freundliche und langfristige Cooperationen eingehen sollte. Der "alte" Sozialismus" ist längst tot - aber die neuen Machthaber wollen nicht weniger - Sklaven und Soldaten!
  4. Arye Ophir Arye Ophir at 01.12.2015
    Gut Herr Kohler, Sie haben eine Meinung; wissenschaftlich, trotz Professur, kann man sie nicht bezeichnen.
  5. John T.C. Mc Gough John T.C. Mc Gough at 16.12.2015
    Diese artikel ist reine Linke bloedsinn! oder meiner Sie S.G.Herr Prof. das30% der Schweizer falsch gewaehlt habe?

Write new comment

The editorial team reserves the right to delete discriminatory, racist, defamatory or inflammatory comments or to block the comment function for this article.

Switzerland is becoming wilder – indigenous but eradicated predatory animals are returning. City dwellers far removed from nature are thrilled at the...

Read more

“Swiss Review”: Once extinct animals are returning to Switzerland. That has to be good news for you, doesn’t it?

Reinhard Schnidrig: Most certainly....

Read more

Georg Kohler, professor emeritus of political philosophy at the University of Zurich, is conducting observation and analysis of the election campaign...

Read more

The Swiss People’s Party (SVP), the largest political party, made significant gains while the small centre parties lost ground, with the left also...

Read more
Politics
11/04/2015

A mountaineer as Mr Europe

His task is to pull the chestnuts out of the fire for Switzerland in Brussels – State Secretary Jacques de Watteville was appointed chief negotiator...

Read more

The Swiss Abroad Act (SAA) entered into force at the beginning of November. This Act is important to Swiss citizens living abroad because it clearly...

Read more

“Swiss Review”: What in your view are the most significant changes involved in the Swiss Abroad Act (SAA)?

Hans Stöckli: One extremely important...

Read more
 

Auslandschweizer Organisation
Alpenstrasse 26
3006 Bern, Schweiz

tel +41 31 356 61 10
fax +41 31 356 61 01
revue@aso.ch